Israel's State in 2012 Presidential Election

The case for voting for President on the issue of Israel is examined.

One nation with a particular interest in the outcome of next week’s Presidential election is the State of Israel.

In a fascinating “point-counterpoint” style article published online, two serious Israeli journalists recently debated the question whether one Presidential candidate as opposed to the other would be the better choice for Israel with respect to the Iranian crisis. 

The published exchange is a refreshing break from the hysterical, highly-partisan rhetoric which is part and parcel of the final days of any political campaign. 


Stating the case for Governor Mitt Romney, Yossi Klein Halevi is “deeply skeptical” of President Obama’s willingness to use military force if all other measures to stop Iran’s development of a nuclear weapon fail. 

The President’s failure, he argues, to support the aborted Iranian revolution of 2009; his failure to “set limits” to the Muslim brotherhood  and his production of a video apologizing for the anti-Muslim Youtube clip all suggest a “pattern of weakness against enemies, of appeasing extremists [and] of missing opportunities.”  And he also believes that the economic sanctions are not going to stop Iran from reaching its goal of acquiring nuclear weapon capability.

Stating the case for the President, Jeff Goldberg contends that Obama has a “core belief” that nuclear proliferation must be stopped, especially in the Middle East.  He also believes that Obama would be motivated, from a legacy perspective, to avoid at all costs going down in history as the President that allowed Iran to arm itself with nuclear weapons. 

He also claims that Obama has, in some respects, been even more hawkish than his Republican predecessor, George W. Bush, especially with regard to the use of drone weaponry, and that it is precisely Obama’s perception as a more dovish left-wing President that gives him the cover to avoid left-wing outrage over such actions.

Back here at home, the question for American Jewish voters is this – just how important is the security of the State of Israel relative to other concerns?

All signs indicate that support for the President remains strong among Jewish voters.  A September poll taken of Jewish voters in Florida, for example, indicated that President Obama held a commanding 69-25 lead over Governor Romney. 

On the other hand, the poll was taken before the debates, and the support - impressive as it is - appears to be lower than the level of support the President enjoyed in 2008, when – according to some exit polls – Obama got 76% of the Jewish vote.  If Governor Romney can land 35% or more the Florida Jewish vote, it might prove the difference in a tight race.  Let us not forget that in 2000, the entire election came down to Florida.


If you are someone with a great interest in the future of the State of Israel, and are going to vote – yay or nay - for any particular candidate based on his or her position with regard to that nation’s security, I recommend the article highly.

fair November 03, 2012 at 01:52 PM
Both candidates have the same agenda as far as Israel is concerned. And because of the state of the economy of the United States and the people's fatigue with wars, whoever ends being the president will hesitate rushing to war yet again.
tony milanes November 03, 2012 at 02:00 PM
Mr. Obama is not israels friend lots of talk but no action he is on the side of passivity and this when push comes to shove he will let the jewsh nation demise just as he let 4 americans die in libya while he watched and did nothing to prevent it. How any jewish person could vote for this man is mind blowing.
Marty November 03, 2012 at 02:15 PM
the same people who voted him will vote him in again. they're not looking at what he's done or can do, they just want him in. alot of the people that are going to vote him in are our college kids who don't even know how life really is in a true socialistic worldm Where your rights are taken away, and those are THE votes he is counting on. It is pretty sad how we've come to this to elect a president, this president
fair November 03, 2012 at 02:34 PM
And you are seriously trying to sell these lies to one of the most educated and knowledgeable "ethnic" groups of the United States at this late hour? Look, save your breath. You might need it for Nov. 7.
Paul Lauenstein November 08, 2012 at 06:50 PM
The notion that President Obama might be anti-Israel is simply preposterous. President Obama took out Osama bin Laden, a sworn enemy of Israel. And check out the endorsement of President Obama by Israel's leading newspaper, Ha'aretz at: http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/11/haaretz-endorses-obama-calling-him-good-for-israel-148290.html?hp=r8.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »